TINGKAT BERPIKIR GEOMETRI VAN HIELE DITINJAU DARI PERBEDAAN GENDER DAN KEMAMPUAN MATEMATIKA

Sofia Sa’o, Finsensius Yesekiel Naja, Agustina Mei

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to determine the level of student thinking based on gender differences by exploring students 'geometrical thinking abilities and creating learning examples to improve students' level of thinking. While the differences in mathematical abilities are high, medium and low mathematical abilities. This type of research is exploratory research using a naturalistic qualitative approach, by taking 3 male students and 3 female students as research subjects which are then grouped based on mathematical abilities. The results of each activity are analyzed and the level of thinking of each research subject is determined. All subjects still ignored class inclusion of quadrilateral shapes even though they were able to distinguish geometric shapes based on the properties of the components. the sequence of learning phases revealed by van Hiele, namely: (1) Information Phase (Information), (2) Guided Orientation Phase, (3) Explicitation Phase, (4) Free Orientation Phase Orientation), and (5) Integration Phase. The results obtained are that both male and female students are at the level of thinking 1. It is different from the difference in students' level of thinking when viewed from their mathematical abilities. For students who are in the high and medium grades, all students are at level 1 thinking, whereas in the low value group only one student is at level 1 thinking and the others are at level 0 thinking. While the learning examples made are Learning Implementation Plans (RPP) and Student Worksheets (LKS) are made with the hope of increasing the level of van Hiele students' geometry thinking from level 1 to level 2.

Keywords


Van Hiele, Gender

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, A.H & Zakaria, E. 2011. Students’ Perceptions Towards the van Hiele’s Phases of Learning Geometry Using Geometer’s Sketchpad Software. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(7): 787-792.

Budiarto, M.T., 1999. Pengembangan, Implementasi,dan Evaluasi Model Pembelajaran Geometri yang Berpandu pada Pendekatan Konstruktivisme dengan Memperhatikan Miskonsepsi dan Aras Berpikir VanHiele

Burger, William F & Shaughnessy, J. Michael. 1986. Characterizing The van Hiele Levels of Development in Geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. January, Volume 17, No. 1.

Clements, Douglas H & Batista, Michael T. 1992. Geometry and Spatial Reasoning. Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. pp 420-464. New York: Macmillan Company.

Freedman, J.L. 1981. Social Psychology. Fourth Edition. USA.

Kho, R.. 1996. Tahap Berpikir dalam Belajar Geometri Siswa-siswa Kelas II SMP Negeri I Abepura di Jayapura Berpandu pada Model van Hiele. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Malang: PPS IKIP Malang.

Marshall, Sandra P. 1984. Sex Differences in Mathematical Errors: An Analysis of Distractor Choices, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Volume 17, No. 4, Fall-1984.

Masriyah. 1988. Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas II Madrasah Aliyah Negeri (MAN) Jombang Dalam Kelas Khusus Wanita, Pria, Dan Ca,puran Pria-Wanita.

Molle, Juliana S. 2000. Analisis Kesalahan Jawaban Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar Negeri Latihan I SPG Ambon Dalam Mengerjakan Soal Geometri. Surabaya: Program Pasca Sarjana Unesa.

Molleong. 1992. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasih.

Nur, Mohammad. 2004. Teori-Teori Perkembangan Kognitif. Edisi 2. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Soedjoko, Edy. 1999. Penulusuran Tingkat Berpikir Model van Hiele Pada Siswa SD Kelas III, IV, dan V Dalam Belajar Geometri. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Surabaya: Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Sunardi. 2000a. Tingkat Perkembangan Konsep Geometri Siswa Kelas 3 SLTPN Di Jember. Majalah Ilmiah Himpunan Matematika Indonesia (MIHMI), Prosiding Konperensi Nasional Matematika X, ITB 17-20 Juli 2000. Sriwulan Adji & Johnson Naiborhu (Eds.), 6(5):635-639. Bandung: P4M-ITB.

Suwarsono. 1990. Potensi Geometri dalam Pengajaran Matematika. Majalah Ilmiah Widya Dharma Tahun 1 No. 1.

Van de Walle, J. A. (2001). Geometric Thinking and Geometric Concept. In Elementary and Middle School Mathematics.Teaching developmentally 4th ed. Boston: Pearson Education..

Maccoby dan Jacklin (1985) Perbedaan kemampuan laki-laki dan perempuan Prosiding Konperensi Nasional Matematika X, ITB 17-20 Juli 2000 Prosiding Konperensi Nasional Matematika X, ITB 17-20 Juli 2001

Stern (dalam Krutetskii, 1976) Kemampuan Laki-laki dan perempuan Jurnal Nasional Matematika X, ITB 17-20 Juli 2000

Soedjadi. (2000). Kiat Pendidikan Matematika di Indonesia: Konstatasi Keadaan Masa Kini dan Harapan Masa Depan. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Sunardi (2005). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Geometri Berbasis Teori van Hiele. Disertasi Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Program Pascasarjana Unesa.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30601/dedikasi.v4i2.1044

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



sintagoogle-scholaronesearchgarudaPKPcrossref 

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Dedikasi Pendidikan oleh LPPM Universitas Abulyatama disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.

Berdasarkan ciptaan pada http://jurnal.abulyatama.ac.id/index.php/dedikasi.