ANALISIS PEMAHAMAN KONSEP ALJABAR MAHASISWA CALON GURU MELALUI PETA KONSEP PADA PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA UNIVERSITAS ABULYATAMA ACEH

Ade Irfan, Anzora Anzora

Abstract


Understanding is the ultimate goal to be achieved from each strategy applied learning in the learning process. However, teachers generally do not know the specific tool that can measure the understanding and misconceptions. Novak refers to the theories Ausubel said that these problems can be solved with a concept map. According to Novak, Concept Map can be applied with the purpose of (1) investigate what is already known by students, (2) learn how to learn, (3) reveal misconceptions, and (4) an evaluation tool. Algebra is one of the materials that are important in mathematics. The mistake in understanding the concept of algebra will impact on the erroneous understanding of other materials, because algebra is one of the foundations of mathematics. Therefore, understanding the concepts and misconceptions that occur in algebra important to know. This study aimed to describe understanding of algebra concepts, find misconceptions as well as evaluating the lecturing process that has been going on mathematics education of Abulyatama University. To achieve these objectives, the researchers used a method-descriptive exploratory study with a qualitative approach. Subjects were pre-service teacher in mathematics education, The Faculty of Education, Abulyatama University. Researchers became the main instrument, while supporting instruments namely; concept mapping assignment sheet (LTPK), the questionnaire, questionnaire responses and the recorder. Data validity checking carried out by the same method on different sources, called triangulation method. Data analysis was performed with the stage offered by Miles and Huberman, namely; (1) data reduction, (2) presentation of data, and (3) conclusion. The results showed that the understanding of algebra concept of pre-service teacher using a concept map on Mathematics Education is at the level of misconceptions portion (MSG). The misconception algebra of pre-service teacher in mathematics education using concept maps happen to identify a secondary idea, in determining the type of map concepts and reasons for selecting it, and in clarifying the relationship with the main idea of secondary ideas. The response of pre-service teacher to the lecture algebra is positive (3.27).

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amran, Y.S Chaniago. (2002). Kamus Lengkap Bahasa Indonesia. Cet. V. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2009). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (edisi revisi) cet. IX. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Bell, F. (1978). Teaching and Learning Mathematics (In Secondary School). Iowa: Wim. C: Brown Company Publisher.

Dahar, Ratna Wilis. (1988). Teori-Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga

Depdiknas. (2003). Pedoman Khusus Pengembangan Sistem Penilaian Berbasis Kompetensi SMP. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Duffin, J. M & Simpson, A. P. (2000). A Search ForUnderstanding. Journal of Mathematical Behavior.

Gulo, W. (2002). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Herawati. S. (1999). Pembelajaran Biologi dengan Pendekatan STM dan Filosofi Konsntruktivisme. Malang: Jurdik Biologi Fakultas MIPA, UM.

Hudojo, H. (2003). Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Malang: IKIP Malang.

Kadir. (2004). Efektivitas Strategi Peta Konsep dalam Pembelajaran Sains dan Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, No. 51.

Kaur, Berinderjeet. Tanpa Tahun. Some Commen Misconceptions in Algbera. Singapore: Institute of Education.

Mia, Aina. (2008). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Konsep Invertebrata dengan Menggunakan Teknik Peta Konsep. Percikan: Vol. 87 Edisi April 2008.

Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif.Terjemahan oleh Tjetjep R. Rohidi. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press).

Moleong, Lexy J. (2005). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Rosda.

Mukhlis. (2005). Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik Untuk Materi Pokok Perbandingan di Kelas VII SMP Negeri Pallangga. Tesis. Surabaya: PPs Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Novak dan Gowin. (1984). Twelve years logitudinal case studies for sciences concept learning. Science Education.

Orton, A. (1992). Learning Mathematics: Issues, Theory and Classroom Practice.Second Edition. London: Cassel Education.

Rachmawati, Yeni. (2005). Penerapan Peta Konsep dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Peningkatan Penguasaan Materi Perkuliahan Mahasiswa PGTK. Action Research pada Mata Kuliah Psikologi Perkembangan II di PGTK FIP UPI (tidak dipublikasikan).

Rohana, Dkk. (2009). Penggunaan Peta Konsep Dalam Pembelajarn Statistika Dasar Di Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas PGRI Palembang. Jurnal Pendidikan, 3(2).

Sadiman, Arif Sukadi. (1946). Beberapa Aspek Pengembangan Sumber Belajar Cet. I. Jakarta: Mediyatama Sarana Perkasa.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sumarno. (1987). Kemampuan Pemamahan dan Penalaran Matematik Siswa SMA Dikaitkan dengan Penalaran Logik Siswa dan Beberapa Unsur Proses Belajar Mengajar. Disertasi Pada PPs IKIP Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.

Siswono, Tatag. Y. E. (2010). Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.

Trianto. (2009). Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivis. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.






sintagoogle-scholaronesearchgarudaPKPcrossref 

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Dedikasi Pendidikan oleh LPPM Universitas Abulyatama disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.

Berdasarkan ciptaan pada http://jurnal.abulyatama.ac.id/index.php/dedikasi.