PEMBELAJARAN TRIGONOMETRI DENGAN PENDEKATAN METAKOGNITIF DI KELAS X SMA NEGERI 11 BANDA ACEH

Irma Aryani

Abstract


The background of this study is the students’ difficulties in resolving the problems in trigonometry material. Trigonometry material requires creativity of students so that students are required to build knowledge and learning strategies. Metacognitive approach is one approach that focuses on how the teaching in learning mathematics or the students who are invited to learn and learn to think. The subjects were the students of class X-6 SMA Negeri 11 Banda Aceh. the total sample is 30 students. The approach used in this study is a qualitative approach. The type of this research is one shot case study design (pre-experimental method). The used instrument for data collection is a test of student learning outcomes, teachers' observation sheet for the ability in managing learning and student activities, and student questionnaire responses. The obtained data were processed using percentages, the ideal time criteria, and the description of the average score in order to get information about students’ activities, students’ responses, the ability of teachers in managing the learning and mastery learning. The effectiveness of this learning can be based on (1) Mastery learning, (2) the ability of teachers in managing learning, (3) Activities of students, (4) The response of students. Learning trigonometry with metacognitive approach would be considered effective if at least three of the four aspects are met with the requisite thoroughness aspects of learning outcomes are met (effective). The results showed that metacognitive approach is effective in trigonometry material in class X-6 SMA Negeri 11 Banda Aceh. It is because, (1) the results of student learning is complete, (2) students’ activities are active, and (3) students' response toward learning are positive, and (4) the ability of teachers in managing learning are in good or excellent criteria.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, O.W. & Krathwohl, D.R; (2001). A Taxonomy For Learning, Teaching, and Assessing (A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives). New York: Addision Wesley Longman, Inc.

Arsyad, N. (2003). Model Pembelajaran matematika untuk menumbuhkan kemampuan metakognitif. Disertasi program S3 pendidikan matematika Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Tidak diterbitkan.

Bell, F.H. (1978). Teaching and Learning Mathematics (In Secondary Schools). Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Company Publishers.

Collins, N.D. (1994). Metacognition and Reading To Learn. New York: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources Syracusa NY.

Hacker, D. J. Metacognition: Definitions and Emperical Foundations. The University of Mephis. Available: http://www.psyc.memphis.edu/trg/meta.html.

Holmes, E.E. (1995). New Direction in Elementary School Mathematics, Interactive teaching and Learning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Inc.

Hunt, R.R; & Ellis, H.C. (1999). Fundamentals of Cognitive Psychology. Sixth Edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill College.

Livingston, J. A. (1997). Metacognition: An Overview. Available: http://www.gse. buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/cep564/metacog.htm.

Nur, M. (2000). Strategi-Strategi Belajar. Surabaya: Pusat Studi Matematika dan IPA Sekolah.

Muslich, M. (2008). KTSP Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi dan Konstekstual. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Nelson, T.O. (1992). Metacognition (Core Reading). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.O’Neil & Brown. 1997. Differential Effects of Question Formats in Math Assessment on Metacognition and Affect. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation.

Nurdin. (2004). Profil Penggunaan Strategi Kognitif dan Pengecekkan-diri dalam Memahami Materi dan Pemecahan Masalaha Matematika Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 3 Makassar. Laporan Penelitian Survei. Surabaya: PPs Unesa Surabaya.

O’Neil Jr, H.F. dan Brown, R.S. (1997). Differential Effects of Question Formats in Math Assessment on Metacognition and Affect. Los Angeles: CRESST-CSE University of California.

Sanjaya, W. (2006). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Sapa’at, A. 11 Desember 2008. Metakognitif (online), (http://sahabatguru.wordpress.com, diakses 25 Oktober 2010)

Schoenfeld. (1987). What’s All The Fuss About Metacognition. Available: http://mathforum.org/~sarah/Discussion.Sessions/Schoenfeld.html

Soedjadi, R., (1999/2000). Kiat Pendidikan Matematika di Indonesia. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti Depdikbud.

Soedjadi, R. (2003). Kiat Pendidikan Matematika di Indonesia. Konstantasi Keadaan Masa Kini Menuju Harapan Masa Depan. Jakarta: Depiknas

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2005). Landasan Psikologi Proses Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Sunarto dan Hartono, A. (2002). Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Jakarta: PT Asdi Maha satya.

Wirodikromo, S. (2007). Matematika untuk SMA Kelas X. Jakarta: Erlangga




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30601/dedikasi.v1i1.68

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.






sintagoogle-scholaronesearchgarudaPKPcrossref 

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Dedikasi Pendidikan oleh LPPM Universitas Abulyatama disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.

Berdasarkan ciptaan pada http://jurnal.abulyatama.ac.id/index.php/dedikasi.