PERAN EPISTIMOLOGI SOSIAL DALAM ADMINISTRASI PENDIDIKAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30601/dedikasi.v8i1.3714Kata Kunci:
Social Epistemology, Educational AdministrationAbstrak
While there is much epistemological debate in the delivery of education, epistemology and the search for scientific studies on educational administration are somewhat less related to research that has a direct impact on educational practice. As a field of knowledge production, educational administration carries out many analyses related to the issue of scientific progress. Its contribution can be made in conjunction with others. That is, innovation or scientific significance is an act of scientific (social) distinction. This means deliberately getting involved with another. In this paper, education administration knowledge is very limited. However, regardless of the diversity of opinion, this paper can be used as a basis for investigating knowledge about the role of social epistemology in educational administration. The analysis carried out shows that social epistemology can be used to transfer knowledge claims in educationReferensi
Aydinonat, N. E., Reijula, S., & Ylikoski, P. (2021). Argumentative landscapes: the function of models in social epistemology. Synthese, 199(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02661-9
Bouma, G. D., & Giddens, A. (1977). New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretive Sociologies. Sociological Analysis, 38(4). https://doi.org/10.2307/3710125
Camic, C., Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1993). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Contemporary Sociology, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/2074573
Durkheim, E. (2016). The rules of sociological method. In Social Theory Re-Wired: New Connections to Classical and Contemporary Perspectives: Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775357
Eacott, S. (2015a). Educational leadership relationally: A theory and methodology for educational leadership, management and administration. In Educational Leadership Relationally: A Theory and Methodology for Educational Leadership, Management and Administration. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-911-1
Eacott, S. (2015b). Problematising the Intellectual Gaze of the Educational Administration Scholar. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2014.976926
Eacott, S. (2017). A social epistemology for educational administration and leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 49(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2017.1315380
Elonga Mboyo, J. P. (2018). Framing ethical isomorphs in educational leadership: a sociological approach. In International Journal of Leadership in Education (Vol. 21, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2017.1349184
Gunter, H. (2010). A sociological approach to educational leadership. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2010.484927
Holmes, O. W., Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1994). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. The American Historical Review, 99(5). https://doi.org/10.2307/2168398
Keim, W. (2021). Frenchman, Jew, Positivist Reading the Rules and Mapping Emile Durkheim in Germany. Durkheimian Studies, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.3167/DS.2021.250107
Lacombe, D., Bourdieu, P., Wacquant, L. J. D., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1993). An Invitation of Reflexive Sociology. Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/3340841
Oplatka, I. (2009). The field of educational administration: A historical overview of scholarly attempts to recognize epistemological identities, meanings and boundaries from the 1960s onwards. In Journal of Educational Administration (Vol. 47, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230910928061
Rammert, W. (1997). New Rules of Sociological Method: Rethinking Technology Studies. The British Journal of Sociology, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/591747
Righetto, G. G., & Karpinski, C. (2021). For a decolonial social epistemology. Transinformacao, 33. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889202133e200039
