HERMEUNEUTICS PARADIGM: AN INSIGHT IN THE APPLICATION OF A MEANINGFUL FUNCTIONAL ENGLISH GRAMMAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30601/dedikasi.v5i1.1588Kata Kunci:
hermeneutics, traditional view of language, functional view of languageAbstrak
This article portrays the fundamental paradigm of language, English in this case, which has transformed from a traditional point of view to a functional one. Dealing with the mandate of the curriculum, both of primary education and tertiary education curriculum, that language learning does not rely simply on patterns, pronunciation, and vocabulary. However, language learning is a learning process by involving the effort in enabling students to strengthen four English skills, listening speaking reading and writing. Though, in this era, communicative competence has been the ultimate goal of language teaching orientation (Savignon, 2017). Changing the mindset of language is not just learning the rules, but also how to change with the mindset that learning language is to be able to actualize students and enable them to use language communicatively and contextually. This view is in line with the hermeneutics philosophical view. It sees language learning as being able to understand meaning and interpret meaning based on context and situation. Language teachers are expected to understand those differences through managing teaching learning process in traditional view and functional view.Referensi
Alwasliyah, A. C. (2014). Filsafat Bahasa dan Pendidikan. Bandung. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Beikoff, K. (1996). How Functional Grammar Works. Daily telegraph. Retrieved June 10, 2013, from http://minerva.ling.mq.edu.au/network/debates/DailyTelegraph.html
Chen, J. (2010). An Empirical Study of Applying Functional Grammar to College English Teaching. Foreign Languages in China, 7(3), 59-64.
Feng, Z. (2013). Functional grammar and its implications for English teaching and learning. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n10p86
Halliday, M. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press Inc.
Hidayat, A. A. (2006). Filsafat Bahasa; Mengungkap Hakikat Bahasa, Makna, dan Tanda. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Idris, F., Hassan, Z., Ya’acob, A., Gill, S. K., & Awal, N. A. M. (2012). The Role of Education in Shaping Youth’s National Identity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.299
Kaelan, M.S. 2017. Filsafat Bahasa; Hakikat dan Realitas Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Paradigma Yogyakarta
Knapp, P., & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, Text, Grammar: Technologies for Teaching and Assessing Writing. Sydney: UNSW Press.
Lock, G., & Jones, R. (2010). Functional Grammar in the EFL Classroom: Noticing, Exploring and Practicing. Palgrave: Macmillan.
Mackenzie, J. L. (2015). What is Functional Grammar? January 1993. https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m.fun1
Makkreel, R. A. (1911). Wilhelm dilthey. Archiv Fur Kulturgeschichte, 9(3), 273–278. https://doi.org/10.7788/akg-1911-0301
Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., & Painter, C. (1997). Working with Functional Grammar. New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc.
Patankar, P. S. (2011). Teacher Education: Need of Paradigm shift from Behaviorism to Constructivism. Indian Streams Research Journals, 1(10), 1–4. http://www.isrj.net/PublishArticles/329.pdf
Savignon, S. J. (2017). Communicative Competence. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1–7. https://dsoi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0047
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The Language of Scooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates publishers.
Suyitno, Y. 2009. Landasan Filosofis Pendidikan. Bandung: UPI
Thompson, G. (1996). Introducing Functional Grammar. New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc.
Xu Rumin. (1993). A Theoretical Grammar of English. Nanning: Guangxi People's Publishing House.
Zhao, X. A., & Liu, R. X. (2015). A Systemic Functional Approach to Code-switching in Chinese Magazines. Ssemse. https://doi.org/10.2991/ssemse-15.2015.27
