THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT THREE INSTRUCTIONAL METHODS ON THE ABILITY TO COMMUNICATE MATHEMATICAL REASONING TO THE SMA STUDENTS

Authors

Abstract

Doing math is important, but understanding and communication what are they doing is more important. Because of that mathematical comminication very important to development to our student. The main purpose of the present study was to investigate the differential effects of Think-Talk-Write (TTW) Strategy and Cooperative Learning on the ability to communicate  mathematical reasoning. Participants were 278 Senior High School (SMA)’s students whostudied the ”Square function graph” unit under three instructional methods namely: Cooperative Learning embedded within Think-Talk-Write (TTW) Strategy (COOP+TTW), Individualized Learning embedded within TTW Strategy (IND+ TTW), and Individualized Learning with no TTW Strategy (IND). Results showed that the Cooperative Learning embedded within TTW Strategy (COOP+TTW) group significantly outperformed the IND+TTW group, who in turn significantly outperformed the COOP and IND groups on various aspects of verbal explanations on graph interpretation test.

References

Cohen, E.G. (1996). A sociologist looks at talking and working together in the mathematics classroom. Paper presented at the American Educational research Association, NY.

Elliott & M.J.Kenney (1996). Communication in mathematics K-12 and beyond: Reston Press

Fredriksen, N. (1994). The integration of testing with teaching: Applications of cognitive psychology in instruction. American journal of Education, 102, 527-564.

Huinker, D. & Laughlin, C. (1996). “Talk Your Way into Writing”. In P. C. Elliott, and M. J. Kenney (Eds.). 1996 Yearbook. Communication in Mathematics, K-12 and Beyond. USA: NCTM.

King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in classroom: Effects of teaching children

how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 338-368

Mavarech, Z.R. & Kramarski, B. (1997). IMPROVE: A Multidimensional method for teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 365-395

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. Academic Press.

Silver, A.E. & Smith, S.M. (1996) Building discourse communities in mathematics classroom: A worthwhile but challenging journey. In P.C., Elliott & M.J. Kenney (Eds.)

Communication in mathematics K-12 and beyond: Reston Press.

Slavin, R.E. (1998). Cooperative learning and achievement: Six theoretical perspectives. In C. Ames & M.L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Downloads

Published

2016-03-30

How to Cite

THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT THREE INSTRUCTIONAL METHODS ON THE ABILITY TO COMMUNICATE MATHEMATICAL REASONING TO THE SMA STUDENTS. (2016). Proceeding International Conference (SBC-MEA) 2016, 1(1), 165-172. https://jurnal.abulyatama.ac.id/index.php/mea2016/article/view/580