CHALLENGES FACED BY PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS DURING MICRO TEACHING
Abstract
This study explores the challenges faced by pre-service teachers during microteaching sessions, focusing on instructional preparation, psychological readiness, and classroom management. Despite the importance of microteaching in teacher education, many student-teachers struggle to navigate its demands, which may affect their professional development. A qualitative research design was employed, involving classroom observations of microteaching sessions, questionnaires completed by 30 participants, and unstructured interviews with 15 student-teachers. Data were triangulated and thematically analysed, with descriptive percentages used to summarise patterns observed in the qualitative data. Findings indicate that a substantial proportion of participants experienced difficulties with lesson preparation and technology use, with approximately 75% reporting related challenges and technical disruptions observed in around 60% of sessions. In addition, about 68% of participants expressed anxiety related to peer and instructor evaluation, reflected in physical signs of nervousness and reduced teaching confidence. Classroom management challenges were evident in approximately 45% of sessions, largely due to disruptive peer behaviours that affected lesson flow and perceived authority. These findings highlight the multifaceted challenges encountered in microteaching and suggest that teacher education programmes should provide integrated support targeting technological competence, emotional resilience, and classroom management skills to better prepare pre-service teachers for real classroom contexts
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Angrosino, M. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research. SAGE Publications.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Canter, L., & Canter, M. (2001). Assertive discipline: Positive behavior management for today’s classroom (3rd ed.). Solution Tree Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
De Almeide & Weber (2025) focuses on online microteaching experiences and professional development, showing contemporary relevance of microteaching. AJTED
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Foddy, W. (1994). Constructing questions for interviews and questionnaires: Theory and practice in social research. Cambridge University Press.
Gokgoz-Kurt, B., & Karaferye, F. (2023). Classroom management and leadership among EFL instructors: Self-efficacy, strengths, and improvement areas. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gefad/article/1262348
Gokgoz-Kurt, B., & Karaferye, F. (2023). Peer evaluation and anxiety in microteaching: Challenges for pre-service teachers. Journal of Teacher Education Research, 45(2), 134–150.
Humaera et al. (2024) examines technology integration and TPACK development in microteaching, useful if your literature section discusses technology in teacher preparation. East South Institute
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Kounin, J. S. (1970). Discipline and group management in classrooms. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Mafulah, S., & Febrianti, A. (2023). Reflective practices and classroom management strategies in microteaching. International Journal of Educational Training, 11(1), 55–67.
Mafulah, S., & Febrianti, E. S. (2023). Investigating EFL pre-service teachers’ pedagogical competence, challenges, and expectations in micro-teaching. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 15(1). https://e-journal.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/jefl/article/view/9299
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Muslimin, A. I., Mukminatien, N., & Ivone, F. M. (2022). The effect of technology-based instruction lesson plan on EFL pre-service teachers’ TPACK efficacy. World Journal of English Language, 12(6), 304–314. https://tpack.org/tpackrefs/archives/3646
Muslimin, I., Hasanah, R., & Putri, D. (2022). Digital literacy and technological obstacles in microteaching among student-teachers. Journal of Educational Technology Studies, 14(4), 88–97.
Purwanti, E., & Suhargo, G. I. (2022). Enhancing pedagogical competencies in pre-service teachers through microteaching: A qualitative study. Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 7(1). https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/IJLI/article/view/9553
Purwanti, R., & Suhargo, T. (2022). Microteaching as a tool for teacher development: A systematic review. Teacher Education Quarterly, 39(3), 21–34.
Rini et al. (2024) presents a lesson study-based microteaching framework, highlighting recent pedagogical innovations in pre-service training.
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.
Sukadi, D., & Safitri, R. (2023). Challenges in integrating technology in microteaching: Perspectives of pre-service teachers. Journal of Teacher Education and Development, 15(1), 45–59.
Sukadi, E., & Safitri, D. F. (2023). Analisis kemampuan TPACK calon guru fisika dalam mata kuliah micro teaching. Kappa Journal, IKIP PGRI Pontianak. https://e-journal.hamzanwadi.ac.id/index.php/kpj/article/view/24570
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
Wettstein, A., Ramseier, E., & Scherzinger, M. (2021). Class- and subject teachers’ self-efficacy and emotional stability and students’ perceptions of the teacher–student relationship, classroom management, and classroom disruptions. BMC Psychology, 9, 103. https://bmcpsychology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40359-021-00606-6
Wettstein, A., Ramseier, E., & Scherzinger, M. (2021). Performance anxiety in microteaching: The role of peer feedback and observational stress. Teaching and Teacher Education, 98, 103245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103245
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30601/dedikasi.v10i1.7534
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Dedikasi Pendidikan oleh LPPM Universitas Abulyatama disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.
Berdasarkan ciptaan pada http://jurnal.abulyatama.ac.id/index.php/dedikasi.





