Teori Keadilan Perspektif Gustav Radbruch: Hubungan Moral Dan Hukum
Abstract
Gustav Radbruch's theory of justice places justice as the main pillar in the legal system. Radbruch emphasised that law cannot be separated from moral values and justice. In his perspective, an unjust law is not a true law. Radbruch identified three basic values of law: justice, legal certainty, and expediency. However, he asserted that justice should be the top priority.Radbruch experienced a change of view after World War II, where he realised that legal certainty should not come at the expense of justice. This research uses the normative method, which aims to examine legal norms. With conceptual and historical approaches. In conclusion, this article explores how Radbruch understood the concept of justice, how it interacts with other legal values, and its relevance in the modern legal context. Gustav Radbruch's theory of justice presents a dynamic interplay between moral and legal relationships, which primarily developed after his experiences with Nazi Germany. His legal philosophy, rooted in neo-Kantianism, grapples with the tension between legal positivism and natural law. Central to his thought is the ‘Radbruch formula,’ which states that grossly unjust laws have no legal validity.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bakti & M. Arfan Tarigan. (2022). Law and Morality: The Hart and Fuller Debate. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 6(2), 245.
Bernard L Tanya, E. (2013). Teori Hukum: Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang dan Generasi. Genta Publishing.
Brian H. Bix. (2012). Radbruch’s Formula And Conceptual Analysis. The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 56, 45.
C. J. Friedrich. (2008). Filsafat Hukum: Perspektif Historis. Nusamedia.
Deni Setya Bagus Yuherawan. (2023). Building a New Concept of the Purpose of Law: A Preliminary Effort. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Law, Governance, and Social Justice (ICoLGaS 2023, 1231.
Dino Rizka Afdhali & Taufiqurrohman Syahuri. (2023). Idealitas Penegakkan Hukum Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Teori Tujuan Hukum. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 6(2),566.
E. Fernando M. Manullang. (2022). Misinterpretasi Ide Gustav Radbruch mengenai Doktrin Filosofis tentang Validitas dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 459.
Erik Wolf. (1950). Gustav Radbruch Rechtsphophie. Kohler Verslag.
Frank Haldemann. (2005). Gustav Radbruch vs Hans Kelsen: A Debate on Nazi Law. Ratio Juris, 18(2), 166.
Golzio, R. T. & L. E. (2022). "The Aristotelian Commutative Justice and The Management of the Firm’s Stakeholder Relations, ” in Philosophy and Business Ethics. Palgrave MacMillan.
Gustav Radbruch. (1932). Rechtsphilosophie, 3rd ed. Quelle & Meyer.
Gustav Radbruch. (1947). Zur Diskussion über die Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit. Süddeutsche Juristen-Zeitung, 2(Sondernummer. Humanitätsverbrechen und ihre Bestrafung), 132.
Gustav Radbruch, et-al. (2006a). Five Minutes of Legal Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 26(1), 13.
Gustav Radbruch, et-al. (2006b). Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 5.
Heather Leawoods. (2000). Gustav Radbruch: An Extraordinary Legal Philosopher. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2, 490.
Helena Hrehova. (2014). Morality and Justice in Social Life. ArtykulyStudia Philosophiae Christianae, 50(3), 8.
Ian Ward. (1992). Radbruch’s “Rechtsphilosophie”: Law, Morality and Form. ARSP: Archiv Für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie / Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 78(2), 333.
Isman. (2020). Legal Reasoning Comparative Model of Asy Syatibi and Gustav Radbruch. Nurani Jurnal Kajian Syari Ah Dan Masyarakat, 20(1), 53.
J. Ortega y Gasse. (1993). The Revolt of the Masses. W.W. Norton & Company.
John E. McAniff. (1953). The Natural Law Its Nature, Scope and Sanction. Fordham Law Review, 22(3), 250.
Komal Parnami. (2019). Concept of Justice Difficulties in Defining Justice. International Journal of Law Management & Humanities, 2(5), 1.
Kurt Wilk. (1950). The Legal Philosophies of Lask, Radbruch, and Dabin. Harvard University Press.
Linda J. Skitka, C. W. B., & Mullen, and E. (2016). Morality and Justice. In Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research (p. 410). Springer Science & Business Media.
Maria Farida Indrati. (2007). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan. Kanisius.
Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.
Muklis Al’anam. (2024a). Pemaknaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) Sebagai Penyelenggara Negara Dalam Sengketa Administrasi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Tesis, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya.
Muklis Al’anam. (2024b). Perbandingan Sistem Peradilan Administrasi Indonesia dan Jerman. Proceeding of Airlangga Faculty of Law Colloquium, 1, 400.
Muklis Al’anam. (2025). Moralitas Hukum Dalam Pemikiran Lon Fuller, H.L.A. Hart, Dan Hans Kelsen. Law Jurnal, 5(1), 146.
Muklis Al’anam dan Radian Salman. (2024). The Relevance Of Jürgen Habermas’s Theory Of Communicative Action As The Philosophical Foundation Of Human Rights Enforcement In Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum, 36(1), 75.
Pat Baver. (2020). Granger movement American farm coalition. Britannica. www.britannica.com/event/Granger-movement
Paulson, S. L. (1994). Lon L. Fuller, Gustav Radbruch, and the “Positivist” Theses. Law and Philosophy, 13(3), 321.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2020). Teori Hukum cet ke-1. Kencana.
Robert Alexy. (1999). A Defence of Radbruch’s Formula," in Recrafting the Rule of Law: The Limits of Legal Order. Hart Publishing.
Ronald Dworkin. (1986). Law’s Empire. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Ronald Dworkin. (2011). Justice For Hedgehogs. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Roscoe Pound. (1914). Justice According to Law. Mid-West Quarterly, 1(3), 227.
Stanley L. Paulson. (1995). Radbruch on Unjust Laws: Competing Earlier and Later Views? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 15(3), 491.
Stanley L. Paulson. (2008). Ein ewiger Mythos: Gustav Radbruch als Rechtspositivist-Teil I. JuristenZeitung, 63(3), 105.
Tristam P. Moeliono, et-al. (2015). Tendensi Reduksionis dan Utilitarianis dalam Ilmu Hukum Indonesia: Membaca Ulang Filsafat Hukum Gustav Radbruch. Konferensi Ke-5 Asosiasi Filsafat Hukum Indonesia, 268–2.
Universiteit Gent. (n.d.). The Pure Theory of Natural Law (p. 1).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30601/humaniora.v9i1.6393
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Muklis Al'anam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
© Jurnal Humaniora : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Ekonomi dan Hukum. Published by Center for Research and Community Service (LPPM) University of Abulyatama, Aceh, Indonesia. 2019