Cancel Culture sebagai Sistem Autopoietik: Logika Penghukuman Sosial di Dunia Digital dalam Perspektif Niklas Luhmann

Yohana Vanessa Rebecca Simarmata, Fitzerald Kennedy Sitorus

Abstract


The cancel culture phenomenon is increasingly prevalent in the contemporary digital landscape, marked by the practice of social punishment against individuals or groups who are considered to have violated collective norms on social media. This study aims to analyze cancel culture as an autopoietic system through the perspective of Niklas Luhmann, focusing on its operationally closed characteristics and its ability to reproduce its own communication structure. The study uses a qualitative approach based on literature studies, with data sources in the form of scientific articles, books, and documentation of cancel culture cases on digital platforms. The results of the study show that cancel culture forms an independent communication system, which processes external input based on its own internal logic. In conclusion, cancel culture as an autopoietic system explains how social surveillance in the digital era has become more fragmented, emotional, and difficult to control, while challenging assumptions about justice, participation and reconciliation in public communication spaces in the digital world.


Keywords


Keywords: Cancel Culture, Autopoiesis, Niklas Luhmann, Social Punishment, Digital

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alfredo Kevin. (2023). Analisis Fenomena Cancel Culture dalam Etika “Klik” Manusia di Era Digital Menurut F. Budi Hardiman. SOSMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(2), 197–203. https://doi.org/10.55123/sosmaniora.v2i2.1930

Ayunda Permata, M., & Nurhadiyanto, L. (2024). Perspektif Perilaku Doxing Sebagai Bentuk Cancel Culture pada Pengguna Media Sosial X. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i4

Beer, D. (2017). The social power of algorithms. In Information Communication and Society (Vol. 20, Issue 1, pp. 1–13). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1216147

Bouvier, G. (2020). Racist call-outs and cancel culture on Twitter: The limitations of the platform’s ability to define issues of social justice. Discourse, Context and Media, 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100431

Chiou, R. (2020). We Need Deeper Understanding About the Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Moral Righteousness in an Era of Online Vigilantism and Cancel Culture. In AJOB Neuroscience (Vol. 11, Issue 4, pp. 297–299). Bellwether Publishing, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2020.1830872

D. Clark, M. (2020). DRAG THEM: A brief etymology of so-called “cancel culture.” Communication and the Public, 5(3–4), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047320961562

Ganefi, G., & Hatikasari, S. (2022). The Impact of Covid-19 Outbreak on Banking Policies in Indonesia. Jurnal Scientia Indonesia, 8(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.15294/jsi.v8i1.35944

Keskin, B. (2018). Van Dijk, Poell, and de Wall, The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World (2018). Markets, Globalization & Development Review, 03(03). https://doi.org/10.23860/mgdr-2018-03-03-08

Kurniawan, T., Ngawan, R., Alno, Y., & Herianto, A. (2022). CANCEL CULTURE AND ACADEMIC FREEDOM: A Perspective from Democratic-Deliberative Education Philosophy. Waskita: Jurnal Pendidikan Nilai Dan Pembangunan Karakter, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.waskita.2022.006.01.1

Mardeson, E., & Mardesci, H. (2022). FENOMENA BOIKOT MASSAL (CANCEL CULTURE) DI MEDIA SOSIAL The Phenomenon of Cancel Culture on Social Media. In JURNAL RISET INDRAGIRI (Vol. 1).

Marwick, A., & Lewis, R. (2017). Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online.

Mueller, T. S. (2021). Blame, then shame? Psychological predictors in cancel culture behavior. Social Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2021.1949552

Muhammad Reza Zulfikar, Ms., Eka Ari Endrawati, M., & Retno Sari Dewi, M. (2023). TANTANGAN DALAM MENJAGA KEBEBASAN BERPENDAPAT DI ERA DIGITAL. www.penerbitlitnus.co.id

Norris, P. (2021). Cancel Culture: Myth or Reality? Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211037023

Rasche, A., de Bakker, F. G. A., & Moon, J. (2019). Complete and partial organizing for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(4), 651–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1824-x

Rini, R. (2021). How to Take Offense: Responding to Microaggression.

Rizky Bangun, C., & Kumaralalita, N. (2022). Kim Seon Ho, You Are Cancelled: The Collective Understanding of Cancel Culture Kim Seon Ho, You Are Cancelled: The Collective Understanding of Cancel Culture ABSTRACT. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 11, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.33508/jk.v11i1.3785

Sailofsky, D. (2022). Masculinity, cancel culture and woke capitalism: Exploring Twitter response to Brendan Leipsic’s leaked conversation. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 57(5), 734–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902211039768

Saint-Louis, H. (2021). Understanding cancel culture: Normative and unequal sanctioning.

Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The Power and Fragility of networked protest. https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/14848




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30601/humaniora.v9i1.6564

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Yohana Vanessa Rebecca Simarmata, Fitzerald Kennedy Sitorus

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



sintagoogle-scholaronesearchgarudacrossref


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

© Jurnal Humaniora : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Ekonomi dan Hukum. Published by Center for Research and Community Service (LPPM) University of Abulyatama, Aceh, Indonesia. 2019